Intelligent Identification of Plant-Derived Biomass Components for Pharmaceutical and Biorefinery Applications
Keywords:
intelligent identification; plant biomass; pharmaceutical analysis; biorefinery; machine learning; multimodal spectroscopy; data governance; sustainabilityAbstract
The identification of plant-derived biomass components has traditionally depended on targeted analytical chemistry and empirical botanical expertise. As pharmaceutical discovery and biorefinery operations become more data-intensive and distributed, there is a growing need for intelligent identification systems that can integrate multimodal spectral, chemical, and genomic information while operating across heterogeneous feedstocks, scales, and regulatory environments. This paper examines the systems-level design of such identification infrastructures. It addresses the structural trade-offs among centralized high-resolution laboratory models, portable edge-deployable classifiers, and distributed learning frameworks. The discussion covers data acquisition architectures, deep representation learning, domain adaptation, chemometric preprocessing, and model interpretability. It further analyzes governance challenges related to data provenance, fairness, transparency, and interoperability across public repositories, industrial consortia, and regulatory agencies. The pharmaceutical and biorefinery sectors are compared to highlight divergent performance requirements: pharmaceutical applications prioritize specificity, reproducibility, and regulatory traceability, whereas biorefinery applications emphasize throughput, robustness to feedstock variability, and lifecycle sustainability. The analysis shows that sustainable intelligent identification depends less on any single algorithmic advance than on the deliberate alignment of sensing infrastructure, model architecture, data governance, and institutional policy. Future systems should therefore be designed as adaptive socio-technical infrastructures rather than isolated classification tools.
References
1. Naik, S. N., Goud, V. V., Rout, P. K., & Dalai, A. K. (2010). Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2), 578-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003
2. Wolfender, J.-L., Marti, G., Thomas, A., & Bertrand, S. (2015). Current approaches and challenges for the metabolite profiling of complex natural extracts. Journal of Chromatography A, 1382, 136-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.10.091
3. Workman, J., & Weyer, L. (2008). Practical guide to interpretive near-infrared spectroscopy. CRC Press.
4. Gowen, A. A., O'Donnell, C. P., Cullen, P. J., Downey, G., & Frias, J. M. (2007). Hyperspectral imaging - an emerging process analytical tool for food quality and safety control. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 18(12), 590-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.06.001
5. Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, 566(7743), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1
6. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
7. Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O., & Walsh, A. (2018). Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature, 559(7715), 547-555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2
8. Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S. V., Thakur, A. K., Buddhi, D., & Das, P. K. (2022). Forest 4.0: Digitalization of forest using the Internet of Things (IoT). Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34(8), 5587-5601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.02.009
9. Misra, N. N., Dixit, Y., Al-Mallahi, A., Bhullar, M. S., Upadhyay, R., & Martynenko, A. (2022). IoT, big data, and artificial intelligence in agriculture and food industry. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(9), 6305-6324. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2998584
10. Tardieu, F., Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Pridmore, T., & Bennett, M. (2017). Plant phenomics, from sensors to knowledge. Current Biology,27(15), R770-R783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.055
11. Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., ... Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
12. Zhao, K., Li, G., Li, C., Jiang, T., Wang, W., & Yang, Z. (2026). Identification Markers for Salvia miltiorrhiza and Its Close Relatives Based on Cell Wall Component Characteristics. Engineered Science, 40, 2122.
13. Yang, J., Xu, J., Zhang, X., Wu, C., Lin, T., & Ying, Y. (2019). Deep learning for vibrational spectral analysis: Recent progress and a practical guide. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1081, 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.06.012
14. Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A., & Vandergheynst, P. (2017). Geometric deep learning: Going beyond Euclidean data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(4), 18-42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.2693418
15. Schütt, K. T., Arbabzadah, F., Chmiela, S., Müller, K. R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2017). Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nature Communications, 8, 13890. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13890
16. Goh, G. B., Hodas, N. O., & Vishnu, A. (2017). Deep learning for computational chemistry. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 38(16), 1291-1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24764
17. Rinnan, Å., van den Berg, F., & Engelsen, S. B. (2009). Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 28(10), 1201-1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2009.07.007
18. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
19. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
20. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723
21. Pereira, H. M., Ferrier, S., Walters, M., Geller, G. N., Jongman, R. H. G., Scholes, R. J., Bruford, M. W., Brummitt, N., Butchart, S. H. M., Cardoso, A. C., Coops, N. C., Dulloo, E., Faith, D. P., Freyhof, J., Gregory, R. D., Heip, C., Höft, R., Hurtt, G., Jetz, W., ... Wegmann, M. (2013). Essential biodiversity variables. Science, 339(6117), 277-278. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1229931
22. Elhacham, E., Ben-Uri, L., Grozovski, J., Bar-On, Y. M., & Milo, R. (2020). Global human-made mass exceeds all living biomass. Nature, 588(7838), 442-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5
23. Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
24. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bioinformatics Insights and Analytics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.