AI-Guided Multi-Omics Risk Prediction of Foodborne Pathogen–Induced Metabolic Dysregulation: Integrating Gut Microbiome Signatures, Natural Polysaccharide Intervention, and Rapid Microbial Detection Frameworks
Keywords:
AI-guided risk prediction; multi-omics integration; foodborne pathogens; metabolic dysregulation; gut microbiome; natural polysaccharides; rapid microbial detection; system architecture; federated learning; algorithmic fairnessAbstract
The rising incidence of foodborne infections, coupled with their long-term metabolic sequelae, demands integrated surveillance and intervention systems that transcend conventional food safety paradigms. This paper presents a system-level architecture for AI-guided multi-omics risk prediction of metabolic dysregulation induced by foodborne pathogens. The proposed framework synthesizes high-resolution gut microbiome signatures, metabolomic and proteomic profiles, natural polysaccharide intervention modeling, and rapid microbial detection networks into an interoperable, data-driven decision infrastructure. Core to the design is a federated learning backbone that ingests heterogeneous multi-omics data from clinical cohorts, environmental sampling, and food supply chain sensors, training ensemble deep learning models to predict individualized risk trajectories for insulin resistance, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and dyslipidemia following enteric infection. By embedding rapid detection frameworks capable of single-cell sensitivity for pathogens such as Salmonella, the system enables near-real-time alert generation and targeted polysaccharide-based dietary countermeasures, informed by mechanistic insights into glycolipid metabolism regulation. The paper foregrounds structural trade-offs between model accuracy, latency, and interpretability, and analyzes the socio-technical demands of deploying such a system across fragmented regulatory jurisdictions. Governance challenges, including data sovereignty, algorithmic fairness across demographic and nutritional strata, and the sustainability of multi-omics data pipelines, are examined in depth. A comparative analysis of centralized versus edge-based AI architectures demonstrates that hybrid deployments best balance computational load, privacy preservation, and responsiveness in field settings. The discussion extends to policy frameworks needed to ensure equitable access to predictive risk tools and to prevent algorithmic bias that could disproportionately burden marginalized populations reliant on informal food markets. By integrating technical design with institutional analysis, the paper delineates a roadmap for transforming foodborne disease surveillance from reactive outbreak management into proactive, AI-augmented prevention ecosystems.
References
1. Hasin, Y., Seldin, M., & Lusis, A. (2017). Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biology, 18(1), 83.
2. Tilg, H., & Moschen, A. R. (2015). Food, immunity, and the microbiome. Gastroenterology, 148(6), 1107–1119.
3. Knights, D., Parfrey, L. W., Zaneveld, J., Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2011). Human-associated microbial signatures: examining their predictive value. Cell Host & Microbe, 10(4), 292–296.
4. Law, J. W., Ab Mutalib, N. S., Chan, K. G., & Lee, L. H. (2015). Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 770.
5. Schmidt, J. W., Wu, W., Harhay, D. M., & Wheeler, T. L. (2025). Identification of Chicken Component Samples Containing Salmonella Concentrations Greater Than or Equal to 1 CFU/g. Meat and Muscle Biology, 9(1).
6. Marvin, H. J., Janssen, E. M., Bouzembrak, Y., Hendriksen, P. J., & Staats, M. (2017). Big data in food safety: an overview. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(11), 2286–2295.
7. Newgard, C. B., An, J., Bain, J. R., Muehlbauer, M. J., Stevens, R. D., Lien, L. F., ... & Svetkey, L. P. (2009). A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metabolism, 9(4), 311–326.
8. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., ... & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 119.
9. Feng, H., Wang, X., Duan, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). Applying blockchain technology to improve agri-food traceability: a review of development methods, benefits and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121031.
10. Danko, D., Bezdan, D., Afshin, E. E., Ahsanuddin, S., Bhattacharya, C., Butler, D. J., ... & Mason, C. E. (2021). A global metagenomic map of urban microbiomes and antimicrobial resistance. Cell, 184(13), 3376–3393.
11. Yilmaz, P., Kottmann, R., Field, D., Knight, R., Cole, J. R., Amaral-Zettler, L., ... & Glöckner, F. O. (2011). Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nature Biotechnology, 29(5), 415–420.
12. Vital, M., Howe, A. C., & Tiedje, J. M. (2014). Revealing the bacterial butyrate synthesis pathways by analyzing (meta) genomic data. mBio, 5(2), e00889-14.
13. Zhao K, et al. Phyllostachys nigra (Lodd ex Lindl) derived polysaccharide with enhanced glycolipid metabolism regulation and mice gut microbiome. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;257:128588.
14. Brewster, R., Tamburini, F. B., Asiimwe, E., Oduaran, O., Hazelhurst, S., & Bhatt, A. S. (2019). Surveying gut microbiome research in Africans: toward a more representative global enterprise. Genome Medicine, 11(1), 28.
15. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). COM/2021/206 final.
16. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Clinical Decision Support Software: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. FDA-2017-D-6569.
17. Wu, W., Solval, K. M., & Chen, J. (2026). Fate of Salmonella Enterica in Sprouted Peanut and Almond Butter Affected by the Use of Ellagitannins From Aqueous and Ethanolic Extracts of Pomegranate Peels. Journal of Food Science, 91(3), e70943.
18. Buck, M., & Hamilton, C. (2011). The Nagoya Protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 20(1), 47–61.
19. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 115.
20. Rességuier, A., & Rodrigues, R. (2020). AI ethics should not remain toothless! A call to bring back the teeth of ethics. Big Data & Society, 7(2), 2053951720942541.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bioinformatics Insights and Analytics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



