Federated Fairness-Aware Learning Framework for Predicting Antiretroviral Therapy Outcomes Across Multi-Institutional Electronic Health Records in Underserved Populations

Authors

  • Miguel Craig School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Chengxiang Jiang Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

Keywords:

federated learning, algorithmic fairness, antiretroviral therapy, electronic health records, health equity, privacy-preserving machine learning, underserved populations

Abstract

Antiretroviral therapy has transformed HIV infection into a manageable chronic condition, yet treatment outcomes remain uneven across demographic and socioeconomic strata, especially in underserved communities where electronic health record data are dispersed across multiple institutions. The rising adoption of machine learning for clinical outcome prediction presents both an opportunity and a structural challenge: predictive models must learn from diverse, multi-institutional data without centralizing sensitive patient information, while simultaneously mitigating disparities that arise from historically biased datasets. This paper proposes a federated fairness-aware learning framework for predicting antiretroviral therapy outcomes across multi-site electronic health records, with explicit design attention to populations experiencing systemic marginalization. We articulate a system-level architecture that couples cross-silo federated learning with fairness constraints, enabling institutions to collaboratively train a global model without exposing individual-level records. The framework addresses longitudinal missingness, demographic skew, site-specific data heterogeneity, and algorithmic fairness through a combination of local debiasing, global fairness aggregation, and continuous fairness auditing. We examine the structural trade-offs among privacy preservation, model performance, and equity objectives, highlighting tensions between local optimization and global fairness. The discussion extends to the governance infrastructure necessary for sustaining such a learning network, including institutional agreements, computational resource allocation, and policy alignment with health equity mandates. By integrating technical design with organizational and ethical considerations, this work offers a holistic blueprint for deploying equitable predictive systems in HIV care. The framework is not merely a technical artefact but a socio-technical intervention that can reshape how health systems learn from distributed data while centering the experiences of populations historically excluded from biomedical research.

References

1. Cohen, M. S., Chen, Y. Q., McCauley, M., Gamble, T., Hosseinipour, M. C., Kumarasamy, N., ... & Fleming, T. R. (2011). Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(6), 493–505.

2. Millett, G. A., Peterson, J. L., Flores, S. A., Hart, T. A., Jeffries, W. L., Wilson, P. A., ... & Remis, R. S. (2012). Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: A meta-analysis. The Lancet, 380(9839), 341–348.

3. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 308–318).

4. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Agüera y Arcas, B. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 1273–1282).

5. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60.

6. Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 3315–3323).

7. Yue, Y., Khanal, A., Lyu, T., Weissman, S., & Liang, C. (2025, May). EHR Phenotyping Methods for Measuring Treatment Adherence Among People Living With HIV in All of Us: Towards Disparities and Inequalities in HIV Care Continuum. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (Vol. 2024, p. 1294).

8. Mohri, M., Sivek, G., & Suresh, A. T. (2019). Agnostic federated learning. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 4615–4625).

9. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning. fairmlbook.org.

10. Xie, C., Koyejo, S., & Gupta, I. (2019). Asynchronous federated optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 8732–8742).

11. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., ... & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 119.

12. Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347–1358.

13. Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2018). Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(11), 1544–1547.

14. Wiener, R. S., Gould, M. K., Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., & Clark, J. A. (2013). "The thing is, what is under my control?": Patient views on computed tomography lung cancer screening. Archives of Internal Medicine, 173(11), 1025–1026.

15. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.

16. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.

17. Chen, I. Y., Szolovits, P., & Ghassemi, M. (2019). Can AI help reduce disparities in general medical and mental health care? AMA Journal of Ethics, 21(2), 167–179.

18. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... & Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.

19. Price, W. N., & Cohen, I. G. (2019). Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 37–43.

20. Murphy, K., Di Ruggiero, E., Upshur, R., Willison, D. J., Malhotra, N., Cai, J. C., ... & Gibson, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence for good health: A scoping review of the ethics literature. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 14.

21. Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care: Addressing ethical challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981–983.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Miguel Craig, & Chengxiang Jiang. (2026). Federated Fairness-Aware Learning Framework for Predicting Antiretroviral Therapy Outcomes Across Multi-Institutional Electronic Health Records in Underserved Populations. Bioinformatics Insights and Analytics, 1(1). Retrieved from https://bioinfia.org/index.php/home/article/view/154