Federated Dual-Attention Segmentation for Privacy-Preserving Multi-Center Pulmonary Nodule Analysis in Computed Tomography Imaging

Authors

  • Paul Yowers School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Erendan Perry Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Keywords:

federated learning, dual-attention, pulmonary nodule segmentation, privacy-preserving, multi-center analysis, computed tomography, healthcare infrastructure

Abstract

The increasing adoption of computed tomography (CT) imaging for lung cancer screening has generated vast repositories of pulmonary nodule data across multiple clinical institutions. Centralized aggregation of such sensitive medical data poses significant privacy, legal, and operational challenges, while the heterogeneity of imaging protocols and patient populations across centers complicates the development of robust segmentation models. This paper presents a system-level framework that integrates federated learning with a dual-attention segmentation architecture to enable privacy-preserving, multi-center analysis of pulmonary nodules. The proposed approach decouples model training from direct data sharing, allowing institutions to collaboratively refine a shared model while retaining raw images on-site. The dual-attention mechanism, combining spatial and channel attention, enhances the model’s ability to capture subtle nodule features and reduces false positives, a critical requirement for clinical deployment. This paper examines the structural trade-offs inherent in federated systems, including communication efficiency, model convergence, and differential privacy guarantees. It further discusses the infrastructure and governance necessary for sustaining such a framework across heterogeneous healthcare networks, addressing robustness to domain shifts, fairness across demographic groups, and policy implications for regulatory compliance. By analyzing real-world deployment scenarios and cross-domain comparisons with centralized and other distributed approaches, the paper highlights how federated dual-attention segmentation can balance diagnostic accuracy with patient privacy. The study also identifies open challenges in scalability, adversarial robustness, and equitable performance, and proposes forward-looking strategies for integrating emerging privacy technologies and standardized data formats. This work aims to provide a comprehensive reference for researchers and practitioners designing next-generation collaborative medical imaging systems.

References

1. Dwork, C. (2006). Differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (pp. 1–12). Springer.

2. Gentry, C. (2009). Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (pp. 169–178). ACM.

3. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60.

4. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 1273–1282). PMLR.

5. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.

6. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Mienhart, F., Roth, H. R., Lieb, M., ... & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 119.

7. Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Litjens, G., Gerke, P., Jacobs, C., van Riel, S. J., ... & van Ginneken, B. (2016). Pulmonary nodule detection in CT images: False positive reduction using multi-view convolutional networks. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 35(5), 1160–1169.

8. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (pp. 5998–6008).

9. Wang, Y. (2025, August). AI-AugETM: An AI-augmented exposure–toxicity joint modeling framework for personalized dose optimization in early-phase clinical trials. In 2025 19th International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (CME) (pp. 182-186). IEEE.

10. Wang, Y., & Ling, C. (2025). Controlling attributes of. xpt files generated by R. In PharmaSUG 2025 conference proceedings. San Diego, CA.

11. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J. Y., & Kweon, I. S. (2018). CBAM: Convolutional block attention module. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (pp. 3–19). Springer.

12. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., ... & Seth, K. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 1175–1191). ACM.

13. Chang, C., Fu, M., Chen, X., Feng, S., Zhang, M., Zhou, X., ... & Liu, Z. (2025, November). Research on PDU-Net Lung Nodule Segmentation Algorithm Based on Path Aggregation and Dual Attention. In 2025 4th International Conference on Image Processing, Computer Vision and Machine Learning (ICICML) (pp. 1897-1900). IEEE.

14. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... & Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.

15. Li, X., Chen, H., Qi, X., Dou, Q., Fu, C. W., & Heng, P. A. (2018). H-DenseUNet: Hybrid densely connected UNet for liver and tumor segmentation from CT volumes. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 37(12), 2663–2674.

16. Oktay, O., Schlemper, J., Folgoc, L. L., Lee, M., Heinrich, M., Misawa, K., ... & Rueckert, D. (2018). Attention U-Net: Learning where to look for the pancreas. In Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (MIDL) 2018.

17. Sheller, M. J., Edwards, B., Reina, G. A., Martin, J., Pati, S., Kotrotsou, A., ... & Bakas, S. (2020). Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 12598.

18. Xu, J., Glicksberg, B. S., Su, C., Walker, P., Bian, J., & Wang, F. (2021). Federated learning for healthcare informatics. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 5, 1–19.

19. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19.

20. Zhang, Y., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2001). Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 20(1), 45–57.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Paul Yowers, & Erendan Perry. (2026). Federated Dual-Attention Segmentation for Privacy-Preserving Multi-Center Pulmonary Nodule Analysis in Computed Tomography Imaging. Bioinformatics Insights and Analytics, 1(1). Retrieved from https://bioinfia.org/index.php/home/article/view/112