Digital Twin Modeling of MYC-Dependent Transcriptional Condensates for Personalized Cancer Therapeutics

Authors

  • Yuelei Liu Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
  • Gao Zhen Tian Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

Keywords:

digital twin, MYC, transcriptional condensates, phase separation, personalized medicine, systems biology, artificial intelligence, clinical governance, multi-omics integration

Abstract

The emergence of digital twin technology offers a transformative paradigm for modeling complex biological systems at the interface of molecular dynamics, large-scale data integration, and personalized medicine. This paper presents a conceptual and architectural framework for a digital twin system that captures the behavior of MYC-dependent transcriptional condensates, which are phase-separated assemblies that modulate gene expression in cancer. The proposed system integrates multi-omics data, real-time patient monitoring, biophysical simulations, and machine learning to create a dynamic, patient-specific replica of the transcriptional condensate network. Emphasis is placed on system-level design choices, structural trade-offs between model fidelity and computational tractability, governance of data and algorithmic fairness, and sustainability of deployment across clinical infrastructures. The analysis draws on recent experimental evidence that MYC undergoes phase separation to selectively influence the transcriptome [6], linking this discovery to scalable digital twin architectures. Cross-domain comparisons with digital twin applications in aerospace and manufacturing are used to highlight unique challenges in biological systems, such as stochasticity, multiscale coupling, and ethical constraints. The paper also addresses policy implications regarding data ownership, algorithmic transparency, and equitable access to personalized cancer therapeutics. By situating the digital twin as a socio-technical infrastructure, this work provides a roadmap for translational research that balances innovation with responsible stewardship.

References

1. Bruynseels, K., Santoni de Sio, F., & van den Hoven, J. (2018). Digital twins in health care: Ethical implications of an emerging engineering paradigm. Frontiers in Genetics, 9, 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00031

2. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7

3. Boija, A., Klein, I. A., Sabari, B. R., Dall'Agnese, A., Coffey, E. L., Zamudio, A. V., ... & Young, R. A. (2018). Transcription factors activate genes through the phase-separation capacity of their activation domains. Cell, 175(7), 1842–1855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.042

4. Björnsson, B., Borrebaeck, C., Elander, N., Gasslander, T., Gawel, D. R., Gustafsson, M., ... & Stegle, O. (2020). Digital twins to personalize medicine. Genome Medicine, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0701-3

5. Shin, J. J., & Gee, J. C. (2021). Digital twins of the heart: A review. Journal of Imaging, 7(8), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7080138

6. Yang, J., Chung, C. I., Koach, J., Liu, H., Navalkar, A., He, H., ... & Shu, X. (2024). MYC phase separation selectively modulates the transcriptome. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 31(10), 1567-1579.

7. Voigt, I., Benedikt, M., & Schröder, K. (2019). Digital twins in health care: A literature review. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 267, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190833

8. Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Regev, A., Oberdoerffer, P., Nawy, T., Hupalowska, A., Rood, J. E., ... & Lim, D. A. (2020). The Human Tumor Atlas Network: Charting tumor transitions across space and time at single-cell resolution. Cell, 181(2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.009

9. Choi, J. M., Holehouse, A. S., & Pappu, R. V. (2020). Physical principles underlying the complex biology of intracellular phase transitions. Annual Review of Biophysics, 49, 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-121219-081629

10. Pfreundschuh, M., & Ebert, G. (2022). Surrogate modeling for biological systems: A review. Current Opinion in Systems Biology, 29, 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2022.100406

11. Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., ... & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012

12. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2020.2975749

13. Meier-Schellersheim, M., Fraser, I. D. C., & Klauschen, F. (2019). Multiscale modeling of cell signaling and communication. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 20(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-018-0083-1

14. Betancourt, M. (2018). A conceptual introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.02434. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.02434

15. Roth, M., & Van der Merwe, R. (2022). Ensemble Kalman filtering for nonlinear biological systems. Journal of Computational Biology, 29(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2021.0487

16. Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2020). Causal inference: What if. CRC Press.

17. Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., & Etzioni, O. (2020). Green AI. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411839

18. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

19. Zhang, B. H., Lemoine, B., & Mitchell, M. (2018). Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 335–340). https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278779

20. Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., & Traar, G. (2018). Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Yuelei Liu, & Gao Zhen Tian. (2026). Digital Twin Modeling of MYC-Dependent Transcriptional Condensates for Personalized Cancer Therapeutics. Bioinformatics Insights and Analytics, 1(1). Retrieved from https://bioinfia.org/index.php/home/article/view/107