Spatial Transcriptomics and Machine Learning Reveal Tissue-Specific Consequences of MYC Phase Separation Across Tumor Microenvironments

Authors

  • Dylan J. Graham Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • Vinay A. Tripathi School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Malcolm Hamilton Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
  • Larry A. Horton Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Keywords:

spatial transcriptomics, machine learning, MYC, phase separation, tumor microenvironment, tissue specificity, systems biology, computational infrastructure, algorithmic fairness, governance

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics has emerged as a transformative technology for mapping gene expression within tissue architecture, enabling the study of cellular heterogeneity and intercellular communication in situ. When combined with machine learning, these high-dimensional datasets can uncover tissue-specific regulatory mechanisms that govern tumor progression and response to therapy. This paper investigates the system-level consequences of MYC phase separation across diverse tumor microenvironments, leveraging spatial transcriptomic data and computational models to reveal how biomolecular condensates of the MYC transcription factor modulate transcriptional programs in a context-dependent manner. We argue that the integration of spatial omics and machine learning not only advances mechanistic understanding but also raises critical questions about the infrastructure, governance, and fairness of deploying such models in clinical and research settings. Through a cross-disciplinary analysis, we examine the architectural trade-offs inherent in processing massive spatial datasets, the robustness of machine learning predictions to batch effects and tissue heterogeneity, and the sustainability of computational pipelines that must balance precision with energy efficiency. We further discuss policy implications related to algorithmic transparency, equitable access to spatial profiling technologies, and the ethical governance of predictive models that may influence treatment decisions. By framing MYC phase separation as a case study in tissue-specific transcriptional regulation, we illustrate how systems thinking is essential for translating spatial transcriptomics and machine learning from discovery science to robust, fair, and sustainable biomedical applications.

References

1. Ståhl, P. L., Salmén, F., Vickovic, S., Lundmark, A., Navarro, J. F., Magnusson, J., ... & Frisén, J. (2016). Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science, 353(6294), 78-82.

2. Marx, V. (2021). Method of the Year: spatially resolved transcriptomics. Nature Methods, 18(1), 9-14.

3. Dries, R., Chen, J., Del Rossi, N., Khan, M. M., Sistig, A., & Yuan, G. C. (2021). Advances in spatial transcriptomic data analysis. Nature Methods, 18(12), 1437-1448.

4. Hnisz, D., Shrinivas, K., Young, R. A., Chakraborty, A. K., & Sharp, P. A. (2017). A phase separation model for transcriptional control. Cell, 169(1), 13-23.

5. Yang, J., Chung, C. I., Koach, J., Liu, H., Navalkar, A., He, H., ... & Shu, X. (2024). MYC phase separation selectively modulates the transcriptome. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 31(10), 1567-1579.

6. Boija, A., Klein, I. A., Sabari, B. R., Dall'Agnese, A., Coffey, E. L., Zamudio, A. V., ... & Young, R. A. (2018). Transcription factors activate genes through the phase-separation capacity of their activation domains. Cell, 175(7), 1842-1855.

7. Bressan, D., Battistoni, G., & Hannon, G. J. (2023). The dawn of spatial omics. Science, 381(6657), eabq4964.

8. Bergenstråhle, J., Larsson, L., & Lundeberg, J. (2020). Seamless integration of image and molecular analysis for spatial transcriptomics workflows. BMC Genomics, 21, 1-7.

9. Fischer, D. S., Schaar, A. C., & Theis, F. J. (2023). Modeling intercellular communication in tissues using spatial graphs of cells. Nature Biotechnology, 41(3), 352-363.

10. Rao, A., Barkley, D., França, G. S., & Yanai, I. (2021). Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics. Nature, 596(7871), 211-220.

11. Longo, S. K., Guo, M. G., Ji, A. L., & Khavari, P. A. (2021). Integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomics to elucidate intercellular tissue dynamics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 22(10), 627-644.

12. Moor, A. E., & Itzkovitz, S. (2017). Spatial transcriptomics: paving the way for tissue-level systems biology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 46, 126-133.

13. Argelaguet, R., Cuomo, A. S., Stegle, O., & Marioni, J. C. (2021). Computational principles and challenges in single-cell data integration. Nature Biotechnology, 39(10), 1202-1215.

14. Stuart, T., & Satija, R. (2019). Integrative single-cell analysis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 20(5), 257-272.

15. Rusk, N. (2016). Spotlight on spatial transcriptomics. Nature Methods, 13(10), 807-807.

16. Keren, L., Bosse, M., Marquez, D., Angoshtari, R., Jain, S., Varma, S., ... & Angelo, M. (2018). A structured tumor-immune microenvironment in triple negative breast cancer revealed by multiplexed ion beam imaging. Cell, 174(6), 1373-1387.

17. Vickovic, S., Eraslan, G., Salmén, F., Klughammer, J., Stenbeck, L., Schapiro, D., ... & Lundeberg, J. (2019). High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling. Nature Methods, 16(10), 987-990.

18. Zeisel, A., Hochgerner, H., Lönnerberg, P., Johnsson, A., Memic, F., van der Zwan, J., ... & Linnarsson, S. (2018). Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system. Cell, 174(4), 999-1014.

19. Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S., & Zhuang, X. (2015). Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science, 348(6233), aaa6090.

20. Eng, C. H. L., Lawson, M., Zhu, Q., Dries, R., Koulena, N., Takei, Y., ... & Cai, L. (2019). Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH+. Nature, 568(7751), 235-239.

21. Lundberg, E., & Borner, G. H. (2019). Spatial proteomics: a powerful discovery tool for cell biology. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 20(5), 285-302.

22. Tirosh, I., Izar, B., Prakadan, S. M., Wadsworth, M. H., Treacy, D., Trombetta, J. J., ... & Garraway, L. A. (2016). Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science, 352(6282), 189-196.

23. Lambrechts, D., Wauters, E., Boeckx, B., Aibar, S., Nittner, D., Burton, O., ... & Thienpont, B. (2018). Phenotype molding of stromal cells in the lung tumor microenvironment. Nature Medicine, 24(8), 1277-1289.

24. Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F., & Regev, A. (2015). Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nature Biotechnology, 33(5), 495-502.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-09

How to Cite

Dylan J. Graham, Vinay A. Tripathi, Malcolm Hamilton, & Larry A. Horton. (2026). Spatial Transcriptomics and Machine Learning Reveal Tissue-Specific Consequences of MYC Phase Separation Across Tumor Microenvironments. Bioinformatics Insights and Analytics, 1(1). Retrieved from https://bioinfia.org/index.php/home/article/view/106